The building now
Loading the latest readings…
The king post figures are the air at the king post, 16 metres up and the highest position in the array, where the warmest and driest air gathers; the floor figures describe the space people stand in. The difference between them is one of the more useful things the record shows. Every figure above is either measured directly or derived from measurements by standard psychrometric relations. The moisture content of the timber itself is not measured.
Four ways to read the record. Click a box to change every chart below.
Temperature
Sunlight
Humidity
Moisture in the air
Condensation margin
Outside air against inside
Every opening is fixed. The two-day forecast read against the record, with the heating call estimated.
Wind
Rainfall
Why it matters
Timber takes its moisture from the air around it and changes size as that moisture changes. Held damp, it decays. Held very dry, it shrinks, checks and works loose at the joints and iron straps that hold this roof together. Between those extremes the level matters less than the movement: every swing is a cycle of strain at the connections, and two hundred years of them is what the condition survey is describing.
So the object of the exercise is a building that moves as little as possible, and the first step is to find out what it does now. The record below is that measurement, running since 30 July 2026.
What is measured, and what is not
Eight sensors report air temperature and humidity, each paired with a probe reading the temperature of a solid surface beside it, because condensation depends on how cold a surface is rather than on the humidity of the room. They sit at floor level, on a ring five metres up, at walkway level eleven metres up and at the king post 16 metres up, with four aspects on the ring so a building-wide condition can be told from a local one. A weather station outside supplies the comparison, and half-hourly observations from London City Airport supply the wind and cloud the site cannot measure honestly. The king post position has been measured since 22 September 2026, and the charts show it from that date.
No target humidity has been adopted. Conservation practice is to measure a building for a full year and derive any target from the climate it has made for itself, so the charts mark only the zone above 80 per cent, where mould can germinate, and otherwise show what is there. On present evidence the building's problem is dryness rather than damp.
Every opening in the building is fixed: mesh insets in eight windows, panels in the two doors, holes at each of the twenty-four eaves, and the meshed opening at the apex. Air passes between low and high as the temperature difference dictates, and none of it can be adjusted. Whether anything follows would be a matter for the Ministry of Defence as owner, for listed building consent and for consultation with Historic England and the local planning authority. Nothing is proposed here. The record exists so that any option could be weighed on evidence rather than assumption.
The full technical account is set out in Environmental Monitoring at the Rotunda: Technical Note, material behaviour and the physics of moisture in timber, the standards the method follows, the instruments and how they are placed, the reasoning behind each sensor position, the damage regimes the record is read against, why it is shown at these four views, how the outlook is forecast and how well it verifies, and the calibration of the array (PDF, seven pages). The instrument-by-instrument commissioning and calibration record is held by the Trust and available on request.
References
On the building: E. Cole, S. Newsome and V. McCaig, The Woolwich Rotunda: From Waltzes to Wargames (Liverpool University Press / Historic England, 2025); J. Clarke, “Cones, Not Domes”, Construction History 21 (2005). Standards and sources for the monitoring method are listed in the technical note. Charts show live measured data; brief gaps are radio weather, not building weather.